The speaker andthe author hold divergent attitudes towards the technic of genetically modifiedtrees. Through relevant reasons and example, the lecture extensively refutesthe blind optimistic viewpoints stated in the reading material.
According to thewriter, being designed to be harder than normal trees, these new types enjoymore chances to survive. However, the lecturer hold a contradict opinion. He claimsthat just because these genetically modified trees are designed to adopt one specificenvironmental condition, they tend to die out if the environment changed. Whilethe natural trees, holding genetically diversity, at least some of them willsurvive the natural disaster and rebuild the cluster. As a whole, natural treeshave more resisitence.
Another givenevidence to support the advantage of planting genetically modified trees arethe high profit they bring, through growing faster, producing greater andpesticides-free. Although seems reasonable at the first glance this statement isalso standing on a shake ground. The speaker mentioned that, by law, the famershould pay the company extra money each time they sow the seeds, which willtake more money than which they save.
Finally, opposingthe author’s belief of using these genetically modified trees to provide asuitable environment for unique, rare native trees, the professor contends thatinstead of protecting, these genetically modified trees are more likely tocrowd native trees out, aggressively occupy limited resources, water andsunlight.
To sum up, basedon thorough analysis of the whole situation, the speaker jeopardize the readingpassage.
AGREE OR DISAGREE ?Professional athletes or performers should not be involved in politics？
People in these days pay more attention tothe entertainment, and they are more exposure to the receation recreationalactivities, such as sports games or some excellent performances.Therefore they get acquianted acquainted with more professional athletes and performers, which could exert huge influence onvarious persons. Because of this, some people might propose that they should beinvolved in politics. However, I disagree with that proposal.
Admittedly, they are better at somespecific fields and therefore are influential. They perform excellent ininternational contest ,contest, win somegolden medals and become popular around the world. But according to these, itis impossible to get a conclusion that they are suitable to get involved inpolitics.Also，because theyare influential, their advice might be supportedunwisely, which is harmful for politics.
Professional athletes and performances wereoccupied with endless trainings, and they lack the capablity capability to be politicians. As for being professional, they must have already spent hugeamount of time to practice. They used to practice the same movement for thousandsof times and to try really hard to be perfect. Because of their strictrequirements, they have taken much time on theirprofessional areas. Their lives even were used to be arranged by otherpersons. And therefore, for otheraspects, they even never experienced before. So they had no idea about adviceon how to manage the whole society or take measures to improve the quality oflife. Allowing them to be involved in politics is not responsible for everyone,even including themselves.
People whose professions are sports or preformance performance might own no interests in being included in politics. During their professionalcareer, they were always under huge pressure and facing difficult chellengeschallenges.After experiencing all sorts of hard training, they are so tired that only hopeis to be a normal person. They might just want to have simple life spendingtime with their families. They didn't have time to communicate with them before,so they could travel around with their wifes wives,or taking care of their parents. They already devoted most of their lives toearn honor for the whole country, and it is not appropraiteappropriateto impellimpel them to do something they are not interested in.
In conclusion, professional athelets athletes or performers are not suitable to get involved in politics. It is also unfair for them not to follow their hearts. They should not fit in politics.
TO #yxfw# : 亲爱的鸥友，因为Helen在带clean+的学生们，点评量不少，暂时不做志愿点评，如果有很多点评需求可以报名我的clean+计划，一对一来进行指导哦
Movies:entertaining or serious?
In the last two decades, there is a significant developmentof film industries. It occupies a part time of our life now, making people’slife more and more colorful. Some audiences prefer to watch entertaining moviesdue to humor. Conversely, not all of the viewers choose comedy movies, of coursethere also partially spectators attracted by serious films. In their view, tosome extend, it offers food for thought for them. But in my opinion, I’d liketo choose entertaining films.
First of all, entertaining films can release people’spressure. With the tremendous improvement of the economies, quit number ofpeople take heavy loads on their shoulder. They need some funny things to relaxthemselves. Generally speaking, it’s not possible for them to choose a seriousfilm. The reason for this is that it’s not only have not release, but also increasethe stress owing them need a high speed mind to analysis the movies. Let’s takea movie named Seven Deadly Sins forexample, obviously, it is a notable serious film, related of greedy, jealous andso on. The figure, acted by Kevin Spacy, who did incredible things and enjoyedin torture and killing. Every time after I watched it, I got a feeling seemslike a stone pressed my heart, and it makes me difficult to breath. Therefore,comedy film is the best choice to relax yourself.
In addition, using recreational movie to reflex socialissues is another function except relaxation. To arouse the deep thought ofviewers, the film usually combines with entertainment and thoughtprovoking plots,For instance, Chicago uses humor waythat reveals the corruption in this city, and become an outstanding film. The marvelouspart, which is counselor for the purpose of saving female prisoner, hemanipulates all of the journalist as poppet. The acting in their face is ridiculous,and it’s also showing the dark side of Chicago.
Finally, serious movies also are best way to express socialproblems. Such as Gone of the wind, ittelling a love story between two aristocrats in the Civil War. Because ofdistorted view of love, the woman does not get happiness life. It’s not like entertainingfilms make audiences feel delight, but arouses them with food of thought.Although of this reason, I still think a delightful life is extremely necessaryfor us.
To sum up, the merits of funny films is surpassed seriousmovies. No matter what kind of films, as long as products a wonderful movie,the directors, actors and producers will never stop working hard to show amarvelous film to spectators, and the recreational movie will also keep workingto satisfy audiences.